Interesting Read on Iran and the Gulf.

This article is written by Abdulrahman Al Rashed, general manager of Al Arabiya news channel, former editor in cheif of Al Sharq Al Awsat. He is one of my favorite writers, along with Abdullah Al Robie (ma yshoof shar).

The nice thing is that Al Rashed writes and article a day in Arabic, and an article every 2-3 days in English.

Here is his latest English article on Iran and their nuclear program, and how it will change the Gulf Region.

Iran announced that it has unraveled the nuclear riddle, succeeded in enriching uranium, and acquired the ability to possess nuclear fuel, but wait, Iran says that it does not intend to use it to produce nuclear weapons, a statement that Tehran will find very few believe. We heard the same rhetoric from Pakistan when its government said that its nuclear research is for peaceful purposes. However, it turned out later that it had produced nuclear weapons and had developed the means of delivering them.

The governments of the region did not believe Iran before, and they will not believe it in the future when it admits that it possesses a nuclear weapon, claiming that it is aimed against Israel only. In the past it has previously used military force to attack Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates and occupied the last of its islands in 1991. It had also intercepted Qatari warships in the Gulf waters. It is no secret that it also has a hand in the security problems in Bahrain, in addition to its exposed activity in Iraq.

After the Iranians have become very close to possessing nuclear weapons, we should ask whether time is ripe now to adopt a balance of deterrence as a policy for the countries of the region. In other words, mounting another nuclear weapon to confront the Iranian nuclear weapon.

A Saudi atomic bomb is not an option, which we were thinking of a few days ago. We are one of the world peoples who cast doubts the most on the industry, trade, and policy of weapons. We were depressed by the wars, which have shocked the region since 1979 between Iraq and Iran and which inflicted material and human losses on the region over eight years in a way that exceeded the losses inflicted by the Arab-Israeli wars over half a century and later the occupation of Kuwait and the occupation of Iraq.

However, we know that there is no other option to deal with Iran, which is armed with nuclear weapons, except through the same balance of terror, which guarded the situation among Moscow, Beijing, and the West, and now between Karachi and New Delhi. We also know that the Pakistanis could not have developed, produced, and maintained their weapon had the West not accepted this in reply to the Indian nuclear weapon and as a deterrence to it.

Based on this formula of balance, what if Riyadh, as a representative of the Gulf region, mounted a nuclear weapon facing Iran? Would this be enough? Here, Egypt will demand the same thing, taking into consideration that it is a central state in the region and is important in the military balance with Iran and Israel as well.

The time sequence of the Iranian nuclear story leaves no room except for skepticism, fear, and preparedness. Regrettably, this has also opened a new serious chapter of arms race in the Gulf. Iran has been telling lies about its nuclear activity from the very beginning. Right from the start, it denied that it has nuclear facilities. When the pictures of these facilities were exposed, it began to talk about a limited scientific nature of these facilities. After the reports of inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) exposed its lies, it admitted that it seeks to enrich uranium to produce energy only. This is an unconvincing argument by a country that is the fourth in the world in the possession of oil, which is cheaper than atomic energy in terms of price and effort. Despite its new denial, we will see the Iranian nuclear bomb. At that point, Iran will justify this by saying that Israel has a similar arsenal. When it uses it the bomb, it will most likely target the Gulf countries, as was the case over 30 years.

If you want to read another interesting article by Al Rashed on Iran and the Gulf also, but this one is in Arabic, click here.

?

Related Entries

  • Iran: Nawya 3ala Khair??
  • Saudi wants no row with Iran
  • Scrape The Internet, Lets Build It Again…Say Researchers
  • Just Apologize!
  • Interesting Read: The American Culture Shock Works for Sure
  • 9 Responses to “Interesting Read on Iran and the Gulf.”


    1. Gravatar Icon 1 Fahad Al TUkhaim Apr 18th, 2006 at 5:11 pm

      Hmmm, a balance of power in the region, eh? I don’t know guys, but the last time I checked the bill for acquiring nuclear technology it was in the BILLIONS! See, this is exactlly what the US wants, I think. Planting the potential fear of Iran using it’s nuclear might against its neighbours. HOWEVER, why the fuck would the US allows us rag-heads to possess nuclear weapons as a counter-measure agaisnt Iran?! Where is the “balance of deterance” there if you got a handful of Muslim states armed with nuclear capability against a potential nuclear orgy over Israel?!
      With all respect, AL Rashed forgot to mention the expatriates and foreigners that make up a majority of a percent of the gulf’s population. Would Iran REALLY risk to make more enemies other than the US? Think about it, India and Pakistan are well armed with nukes and have vital interests in the gulf states. IF Iran decided to nuke the United Indian…er,um excuse me…United Arab Emirates on day, wouldn’t India protect its human work force? Last time I checked, the gulf countries are loaded with Indians and Pakistanis. Would their respectable countries allow them to be threatened and ruin a source of income?!

      YOBA,I think America wants us to spend more money in protecting ourselves against an enemy they created by buying their weaponry. Remember 1991? When all the gulf countries invested heavily in arms and Patriot missles against Saddam’s scuds and Republican Gaurd?! Wallah we don’t learn. AhmedALNajada , how the heck do you spell his name, is the new dictator on the block and he’s got some nice shiny nukes. So what do we do? Like all Arabs, we need to get the best and the latest…from the Uncle Sam menu!

    2. Gravatar Icon 2 Yazeed Apr 18th, 2006 at 5:19 pm

      hmm interesting point, espcially when oil now costs 71$ a barrel!
      and its ahmedi najad (lol at ur spelling, poor guy, must be hard for him living in the states right now :P)

    3. Gravatar Icon 3 Atsooo Apr 19th, 2006 at 7:39 am

      ???? ???? … ??? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? “???????????? ????????” … ???? ?? ??????? ??? ????? … ? ??? ???? “?????????? ???????” … ???? ??????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? :)

      ???? ????? p;

    4. Gravatar Icon 4 Fahad Al TUkhaim Apr 19th, 2006 at 11:32 am

      you mean El Dawlah el Fa6imiyah

    5. Gravatar Icon 5 Marzouq Apr 20th, 2006 at 3:10 am

      I dont think the guys in Iran want to start a war of any kind. But the nuclear weapons they have will be a problem. Only time will tell.

    6. Gravatar Icon 6 Fahad Al TUkhaim Apr 20th, 2006 at 11:21 pm

      I dont think its for the benefit of Iran OR the US to engage in a war!

    7. Gravatar Icon 7 Yazeed Apr 20th, 2006 at 11:48 pm

      I totally agree with you fahad.
      One of my roommates is in the Air Force. They are training on Iran scenarios this summer. And he is supposed to go to iraq after Christmas, but he feels he is going to iran instead. You never know what is going to happen!

    8. Gravatar Icon 8 Carlsb3rg Apr 22nd, 2006 at 7:09 am

      I don’t think Iran will bomb one of the gulf countries. There are also alot of Iranians living in the gulf countries. I would see Iraq as the only interest for Iran, and it already has a hand there. I think the biggest threat to the gulf region if we have an iranian chernobyl. Especially since Iran probably buys resources from Russia, China or N.Korea, and thus their technology would probably be based on theirs. The torpedo Iran recently revealed is an example, which is a copy of a similar russian torpedo that russia developed in the 70s.

      http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_060420_shkval,,00.html

    9. Gravatar Icon 9 Yazeed Apr 22nd, 2006 at 8:29 am

      I don’t think they will bomb the gulf, but they can threaten, and an irani Chernobyl would be a freaking disaster.

    Leave a Reply




    Grab My Feed!

    • Subscribe via Feedburner
    • Subscribe in Yahoo
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to Google
    • Subscribe in FeedLounge
    • Add to netvibes
    • Subscribe in Bloglines

     

    December 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  

    • Total Stats
      • 908 Posts
      • 5,541 Comments
      • 925 Comment Posters



    Stop Global Warming